Домашнее задание выдается индивидуально каждому студенту. По варианту задания (см. раздел 2 Методических указаний) студент выбирает 10 вопросов (см. раздел 3 Методических указаний), на которые он должен дать ответ.
На кафедре «Охраны и безопасности на море» студент, также, получает в электронном виде[1] (на личную флешку или диск) текст Кодекса ОСПС.
- Студент делает самостоятельный перевод с английского на русский язык всех вопросов своего задания.
- На указанных для каждого вопроса страницах Кодекса ОСПС (см. раздел 3 Методических указаний) студент ищет ответы на поставленные вопросы.
- Найдя ответы, студент выписывает[2] их, указывая номер соответствующего параграфа Кодекса ОСПС для каждого ответа.
Самостоятельно изучив Кодекс ОСПС, переведя вопросы задания с английского на русский язык, студент предъявляет преподавателю выполненное домашнее задание в следующем виде:
- перечень вопросов домашнего задания на английском языке и их перевод на русский или украинский язык с указанием номеров вопросов согласно Методическим указаниям (оформление см. Табл. 1 Приложения);
- ответы на вопросы домашнего задания с указанием номера соответствующего параграфа Кодекса ОСПС для каждого ответа (оформление см. Табл. 2 Приложения).
Образец оформления выполненного домашнего задания приведен в приложении к данным Методическим указаниям.
Выполненное домашнее задание оформляется либо на компьютере, либо от руки на стандартных листах формата А4 с одной стороны и подписывается на титульной странице выполнившим его студентом.
Оценка домашнего задания учитывается в итоговой оценке по дисциплине «Охрана судов и портовых средств». Максимальная оценка за домашнее задание[3] – 2 балла:
- менее 6 правильных ответов - 0 баллов.
Студент, как правило, выбирает номер варианта домашнего задания из приведенной ниже таблицы 2.1 в соответствии с порядковым номером студента в журнале «Учета посещаемости учебных занятий студентами их успеваемости и учета нагрузки преподавателя» или номер варианта студенту задает преподаватель.
Продолжение Табл. 2.1
Продолжение Табл. 2.1
Продолжение Табл. 2.1
Продолжение Табл. 2.1
Продолжение Табл. 2.1
Продолжение Табл. 2.1
Продолжение Табл. 2.1
Продолжение Табл. 2.1
- DoS - Declaration of Security.
| Продолжение Табл. 3.1
|
| № п/п
| Вопросы
| Страницы
Кодекса ОСПС
|
| 10.
| The Company shall establish in the ship security plan that the master has the overriding authority and responsibility to make decisions with respect to the safety andsecurity of the ship and to request the assistance of the Company or of any Contracting Government as may be necessary, isn’t it?
| 11 – 13
|
| 11.
| Which activities shall be carried out, through appropriate measures, on all ships, in order to identify and take preventive measures against security incidents at security level 1?
| 14 – 16
|
| 12.
| Shall the additional protective measures, specified in the ship security plan, be implemented for each activity detailed in section 7.2 at security level 2?
| 13 – 15
|
| 13.
| Shall further specific protective measures, specified in the ship security plan, be implemented for each activity detailed in section 7.2 at security level 3?
| 12 – 14
|
| 14.
| Which main duties and responsibilities must the company security officer have?
| 21 – 23 A.11.2
|
| 15.
| Shall a ship security officer be designated on each ship?
| 22 – 24
|
| 16.
| Which duties and responsibilities must the ship security officer have?
| 21 – 23
|
| 17.
| Which knowledge of should the CSO and appropriate shore based Company personnel,and the SSO have?
| 95 – 97
|
| 18.
| Which adequate knowledge of should the SSO have in addition?
| 97 – 99
|
| 19.
| Which knowledge should shipboard personnel having specific security duties have?
| 97 – 100
|
| 20.
| Should drills be conducted at least once every three months to ensure the effective implementation of the provisions of the ship security plan?
| 97 – 99
|
| 21.
| Shall a port facility security officer be designated for each port facility?
| 29 – 31
|
| 22.
| Which duties and responsibilities must the port facility security officer have?
| 28 – 31
|
| 23.
| Shall the text of International Ship Security Certificate include a translation into English, French or Spanish, if the language used is not one of these languages?
| 32 –34
|
| 24.
| Which knowledge of should the PFSO have?
| 127 – 129
|
| 25.
| Which knowledge should Port facility personnel having specific security duties have?
| 130 – 132
|
| 26.
| Which verifications shall each ship be subject to?
| 29 –32
|
| 27.
| Should drills be conducted at least every three months unless the specific circumstances dictate otherwise to ensure the effective implementation of the provisions of the port facility security plan?
| 130 – 132
|
| 28.
| Shall International Ship Security Certificate be issued after the initial or renewal verification?
| 32 –34
|
| 29.
| Shall an International Ship Security Certificate be issued for a period specified by the Administration which shall not exceed five years?
| 31 –33
|
| 30.
| Which cases shall A certificate cease to be valid in?
| 35 –37
|
| 31.
| Is the Ship Security Assessment an essential and integral part of the process of developing and updating the ship security plan?
| 15 – 17
|
| 32.
| Who shall ensure that the ship security assessment is carried out by persons with appropriateskills to evaluate the security of a ship?
| 14 – 16
|
| 33.
| Which elements shall the ship security assessment include under an on-scene security survey?
| 16 – 19
|
| 34.
| Shall the ship security assessment be documented, reviewed, acceptedand retained by the Company?
| 15 – 18
|
| 35.
| Who is responsible for ensuring that a SSA is carried out for each of the ships in the Company’s fleet?
| 71 – 73
|
| 36.
| Prior to commencing the SSA, the CSO should ensure that advantage is taken of information available on the assessment of threat for the ports at which the ship will call or at which passengers embark or disembark and about the port facilities and their protective measures, isn’t he?
| 73 – 75
|
| 37.
| Which elements on board or within the ship should a SSA address?
| 73 – 75
|
| 38.
| The SSA should examine each identified point of access, including open weather decks, and evaluate its potential for use by individuals who might seek to breach security, isn’t it?
| 74 – 76
|
| 39.
| Which information required conducting an assessment should the CSO obtain and record?
| 73 – 75
|
| 40.
| Which existing security measures and guidance, procedures and operations, under both routine and emergency conditions should the SSA consider and determine?
| 74 – 76
|
| 41.
| Which persons, activities, services and operations that it is important to protect should the SSA consider?
| 76 – 78
|
| 42.
| Which possible threats and types of security incidents should the SSA consider?
| 75 – 77
|
| 43.
| Which possible vulnerabilities should the SSA take into account?
| 78 – 80
|
| 44.
| Should particular consideration be given to the convenience, comfort and personal privacy of the ship’s personnel and their ability to maintain their effectiveness over long periods, when developing security measures?
| 78 – 80
|
| 45.
| Upon completion of the SSA, a report shall be prepared, consisting of a summary of how the assessment was conducted, a description of vulnerability found during the assessment and a description of counter measures that could be used to address vulnerability, isn’t it?
| 77 – 79
|
| 46.
| Should the report of the SSA be reviewed and accepted by the CSO, if the SSA has not been carried out by the Company?
| 76 – 78
|
| 47.
| Which existing shipboard protective measures, procedures and operations should the on-scene security survey examine and evaluate?
| 78 – 80
|
| 48.
| Shall each ship carry on board a ship security plan approved by the Administration?
| 14 – 16
|
| 49.
| Shall the submission of aship security plan or ofamendmentsto a previously approved plan, for approval be accompanied by the security assessment on the basis of which the plan, orthe amendments, has been developed?
| 17 – 19
|
| 50.
| In which language or languages shall the SSP be written?
| 16 – 18
|
| 51.
| Shall the plan address frequency for testing or calibration ofany security equipment provided on board?
| 16 – 20
|
| 52.
| Shall the plan address duties of shipboard personnel assigned security responsibilities and of other shipboard personnel on security aspects?
| 16 – 19
|
| 53.
| Shall personnel conducting internal audits of the security activities specified in the plan or evaluating its implementation be independent of the activities being audited unless this is impracticable due to the size and the nature of the Company or of the ship?
| 19 – 21
|
| 54.
| Shall the plan address procedures to ensure the inspection, testing, calibration, and maintenance of any security equipment provided on board?
| 17 – 19
|
| 55.
| Shall the plan address identification of the locations where the ship security alert system activation points are provided?
| 16 – 20
|
| 56.
| Shall the SSP address procedures for training, drillsand exercises associated with the plan?
| 17 – 19
|
| 57.
| Shall the plan address procedures, instructions and guidance on the use of the ship security alert system, including the testing, activation, deactivation and resetting and to limit false alerts?
| 16 – 18
|
| 58.
| Has the CSO the responsibility of ensuring that a SSP is prepared and submitted for approval?
| 79 – 81
|
| 59.
| Should SSPs detail the organizational structure of security for the ship?
| 79 – 81
|
| 60.
| Should SSPs detail the ship’s relationships with the Company, port facilities, other ships and relevant authorities with security responsibility?
| 79 – 81
|
| 61.
| Should SSPs detail the communication systems to allow effective continuous communication within the ship and between the ship and others, including port facilities?
| 78 – 80
|
| 62.
| Preparation of an effective SSP should rest on a thorough assessment of all issues that relate to the security of the ship, including, in particular, a thorough appreciation of the physical and operational characteristics, including the voyage pattern, of the individual ship, isn’t it?
| 78 – 80
|
| 63.
| Should the SSP establish the procedures or safeguards necessary to allow continuous communications to be maintained at all times?
| 81 – 83
|
| 64.
| Should the SSP establish the security measures covering all means of access to the ship identified in the SSA?
| 82 – 84
|
| 65.
| Should the SSP establish the procedures and practices to protect security sensitive information held in paper or electronic format which relate to all security levels?
| 80 – 82
|
| 66.
| Which security measures to control access to the ship should the SSP establish at security level 1?
| 81 – 83
|
| 67.
| Should the SSP establish the procedures needed to assess the continuing effectiveness of security procedures and any security and surveillance equipment and systems, including procedures for identifying and responding to equipment or systems failure or malfunction?
| 79 – 81
|
| 68.
| Should the SSP identify the appropriate locations where access restrictions or prohibitions should be applied for each of the security levels?
| 81 – 83
|
| 69.
| Should the SSP establish for each security level the means of identification required to allow access to the ship and for individuals to remain on the ship without challenge?
| 80 – 82
|
| 70.
| Should those unwilling or unable to establish their identity and/or to confirm the purpose of their visit when requested to do so be denied access to the ship and should their attempt to obtain access be reported to the SSOs, the CSOs, the PFSO and to the national or local authorities with security responsibilities?
| 83 – 85
|
| 71.
| Should the SSP establish the frequency of application of any access controls particularly if they are to be applied on a random, or occasional, basis?
| 82 – 84
|
| 72.
| Should all those seeking to board a ship be liable to search and should the frequency of such searches, including random searches, be specified in the approved SSP?
| 84 – 85
|
| 73.
| Which security measures to be applied to protect against a heightened risk of a security incident to ensure higher vigilance and tighter control should the SSP establish at security level 2?
| 83 – 86
|
| 74.
| Should the SSP identify the restricted areas to be established on the ship, specify their extent, times of application, the security measures to be taken to control access to them and those to be taken to control activities within them?
| 83 – 86
|
| 75.
| What are the purposes of restricted areas?
| 86 – 88
|
| 76.
| Should the SSP ensure that there areclearly established policies and practices to control access to all restricted areas?
| 85 – 87
|
| 77.
| Should the frequency and intensity of the monitoring of, and control of access to restricted areas be increased to ensure that only authorized persons have access at security level 2?
| 85 – 87
|
| 78.
| What may restricted areas include?
| 86 – 88
|
| 79.
| Should the SSP provide that all restricted areas should be clearly marked indicating that access to the area is restricted and that unauthorized presence within the area constitutes a breach of security?
| 83 – 86
|
| 80.
| There should always be some way of confirming that stores presented for delivery are accompanied by evidence that they have been ordered by the ship, isn’t it?
| 89 – 91
|
| 81.
| Which security measures to be applied to restricted areas should the SSP establish at security level 1?
| 86 – 88
|
| 82.
| Which security measures to be applied during cargo handling should the SSP establish at security level 1?
| 87 – 89
|
| 83.
| What should security measures relating to the delivery of ship’s stores prevent?
| 89 – 91
|
| 84.
| Which security measures to be applied during delivery of ship’s stores should the SSP establish at security level 1?
| 89 – 91
|
| 85.
| Should the SSP establish the additional security measures to be applied during delivery of ship’s stores by exercising checks prior to receiving stores on board and intensifying inspections at security level 2?
| 89 – 91
|
| 86.
| Should the SSP establish the security measures to be applied to ensure that unaccompanied baggage (i.e. any baggage, including personal effects, which is not with the passenger or member ofship’s personnel at the point of inspection or search) is identified and subjected to appropriate screening, including searching, before it is accepted on board the ship?
| 90 – 94
|
| 87.
| Should the SSP establish the security measures to be applied when handling unaccompanied baggage to ensure that unaccompanied baggage is screened or searched up to and including 100 percent, which may include use of x-ray screening at security level 1?
| 92 – 94
|
| 88.
| Should the SSP establish the additional security measures to be applied when handling unaccompanied baggagewhich should include 100 percent x-ray screening of all unaccompanied baggage at security level 2?
| 91 – 93
|
| 89.
| Should the ship have the capability to monitor the ship, the restricted areas on board and areas surrounding the ship?
| 91 – 93
|
| 90.
| Should the SSP establish the procedures and equipment needed at each security level and the means of ensuring that monitoring equipment will be able to perform continually, including consideration of the possible effects of weather conditions or of power disruptions?
| 93 – 96
|
| 91.
| Which circumstances should the SSP consider when establishing the appropriate level and location of lighting at security level 1?
| 92 – 94
|
| 92.
| May additional lighting be necessary to protect against a heightened risk of a security incidents?
| 93 – 95
|
| 93.
| Should the SSP establish the security measures to be applied which may be a combination of lighting, watch keepers, security guards or use of security and surveillance equipment to allow ship’s security personnel to observe the ship in general, and barriers and restricted areas in particular at security level 1?
| 92 – 94
|
| 94.
| Which additional security measures to be applied to enhance the monitoring and surveillance capabilities should the SSP establish at security level 2?
| 94 – 96
|
| 95.
| Should the SSP establish details of the procedures and security measures the ship could adopt if the ship is at a higher security level than that applying to a port facility?
| 93 – 95
|
| 96.
| Should the SSP establish details of the procedures and security measures the ship should apply when it is at a port of a State which isnot a Contracting Government, or it is interfacing with a ship to which ISPS Code does not apply, it is interfacing with fixed or floating platforms or a mobile drilling unit on location, or it is interfacing with a port or port facility which is not required to comply with chapter XI-2 and part A of ISPS Code?
| 94 – 97
|
| 97.
| Should the SSP detail how requests for DoS from a port facility will be handled and the circumstances under which the ship itself should request a DoS?
| 96 – 98
|
| 98.
| Should the SSP establish how the CSO and the SSO intend to audit the continued effectiveness of the SSP and the procedure to be followed to review, update or amend the SSP?
| 95 – 97
|
| 99.
| Shall persons carrying out the assessment have appropriate skills to evaluate the security of the port facility?
| 24 – 26
|
| 100.
| Is the port facility security assessment an essential and integral part of the process of developing and updating the port facility security plan?
| 24 – 26
|
| 101.
| Which elements shall the port facility security assessment include?
| 25 – 27
|
| 102.
| Shall the port facility security assessments periodically be reviewed and updated, taking account of changing threats and/or minor changes in the port facility?
| 26 – 28
|
| 103.
| Is the identification and evaluation of important assets and infrastructure a process through which the relative importance of structures and installations to the functioning of the port facility can be established?
| 101 – 103
|
| 104.
| Shall a report be prepared, consisting of a summary of how the assessment was conducted, a description of vulnerability found during the assessment and a description of counter measures that could be used to address vulnerability upon completion of the port facility security assessment?
| 24 – 26
|
| 105.
| Which elements should a PFSA address within a port facility?
| 101 – 103
|
| 106.
| Should identification and evaluation of assets and infrastructure be used to prioritise their relative importance for protection?
| 100 – 102
|
| 107.
| Which assets and infrastructure should be consideredimportant to protect?
| 102 – 104
|
| 108.
| Should the PFSA include an assessment undertaken in consultation with the relevant national security organizations?
| 102 – 105
|
| 109.
| Which types of security incidents and threats should the PFSA consider?
| 102 – 104
|
| 110.
| Which factors should security measures be selected on and which information should be evaluated?
| 105 – 107
|
| 111.
| Might an analysis reveal vulnerabilities in a port facility’s security systems or unprotected infrastructure such as water supplies, bridges etc that could be resolved through physical measures, e.g. permanent barriers, alarms, surveillance equipment etc?
| 104 – 106
|
| 112.
| Consideration of which elements should identification of vulnerabilities include?
| 104 – 106
|
| 113.
| Shall a port facility security plan be developed and maintained, on the basis of a port facility security assessment, for each port facility, adequate for the ship/port interface?
| 27 – 29
|
| 114.
| Shall the PFSP be approved by the Contracting Government in whose territory the port facility is located?
| 26 – 28
|
| 115.
| Shall the PFSP be in the working language of the port facility?
| 25 – 27
|
| 116.
| Which measures, procedures and duties shall the PFSP address?
| 27 – 29
|
| 117.
| May the PFSP be kept in an electronic format?
| 27 – 29
|
| 118.
| Shall the PFSP be protected from unauthorized access or disclosure?
| 27 – 29
|
| 119.
| Is preparation of the PFSP the responsibility of the PFSO?
| 106 – 108
|
| 120.
| What should the PFSP detail and provide?
| 106 – 109
|
| 121.
| Should the security measures of the PFSP be in place within a reasonable period of the PFSP’s approval and should the PFSP establish when each measure will be in place?
| 108 – 110
|
| 122.
| Should the PFSP make provision for the retention of records of security incidents and threats, reviews, audits, training, drills and exercises as evidence of compliance with requirements of ISPS Code?
| 106 – 108
|
| 123.
| What should the PFSP establish which relate to all security levels?
| 108 – 111
|
| 124.
| Should the PFSP establish the security measures covering all means of access to the port facility identified in the PFSA?
| 108 – 110
|
| 125.
| Should the PFSP specify the type of restriction or prohibition to be applied and the means of enforcing them for each security level?
| 110 – 112
|
| 126.
| Should the PFSP establish for each security level the means of identification required to allow access to the port facility and for individuals to remain within the port facility without challenge?
| 110 – 112
|
| 127.
| Who should be denied access to the port facility and should their attempt to obtain access be reported to the PFSO and to the national or local authorities with security responsibilities?
| 109 – 111
|
| 128.
| Should the PFSP identify the locations where persons, personal effects, and vehicle searches are to be undertaken?
| 111 – 113
|
| 129.
| Should the PFSP establish separate locations for checked and unchecked persons and their effects?
| 110 – 112
|
| 130.
| Which security measures should the PFSP establish at the control points at security level 1?
| 112 – 114
|
| 131.
| Should the PFSP establish the frequency of application of any access controls particularly if they are to be applied on a random, or occasional, basis?
| 109 – 111
|
| 132.
| Should those seeking access to the port facility be liable to search at security level 1?
| 111 – 113
|
| 133.
| Which additional security measures should the PFSP establish at the control points at security level 2?
| 111 – 113
|
| 134.
| Should the PFSP identify the restricted areas to be established within the port facility, specify their extent, times of application, the security measures to be taken to control access to them and those to be taken to control activities within them?
| 114 – 116
|
| 135.
| What is the purpose of restricted areas?
| 113 – 115
|
| 136.
| Which additional security measures to be applied during cargo handling should the PFSP establish at security level 2 to enhance control?
| 118 – 120
|
| 137.
| Which actions should the PFSP have clearly established to control at all restricted areas?
| 113 – 115
|
| 138.
| Should the PFSP provide that all restricted areas should be clearly marked indicating that access to the area is restricted and that unauthorized presence within the area constitutes a breach of security?
| 115 – 117
|
| 139.
| Which elements of the port facility may restricted areas include?
| 114 – 116
|
| 140.
| Which security measures to be applied to restricted areas should the PFSP establish at security level 1?
| 114 – 116
|
| 141.
| Which additional security measures to be applied to restricted areas should the PFSP establish at security level 2?
| 116 – 118
|
| 142.
| Should security measures include inventory control procedures at access points to the port facility?
| 117 – 119
|
| 143.
| Which security measures to be applied during cargo handling should the PFSP establish at security level 1?
| 116 – 118
|
| 144.
| Which means may cargo checking be accomplished by?
| 118 – 120
|
| 145.
| Which means may detailed cargo checking be accomplished by?
| 117 – 119
|
| 146.
| What should security measures relating to the delivery of ship’s stores ensure and prevent?
| 120 – 123
|
| 147.
| Which security measures to be applied to control the delivery of ship’s stores should the PFSP establish at security level 1?
| 120 – 123
|
| 148.
| Which means may ship’s stores checking be accomplished by?
| 119 – 121
|
| 149.
| Which additional security measures to be applied to enhance the control the delivery of ship’s stores should the PFSP establish at security level 2?
| 121 – 123
|
| 150.
| Which means may detailed checking of ship’s stores be accomplished by?
| 120 – 123
|
| 151.
| Who should rest the responsibility for screening of unaccompanied baggage (i.e. any baggage, including personal effects, which is not with the passenger or member ofship’s personnel at the point of inspection or search), if such baggage will be subjected to screening by both the port facility and the ship, and in cases where both are suitably equipped?
| 120 – 122
|
| 152.
| Should the PFSP establish the security measures to be applied when handling unaccompanied baggage to ensure that unaccompanied baggage is screened or searched up to and including 100 percent, which may include use of x-ray screening at security level 1?
| 122 – 124
|
| 153.
| Should the PFSP establish the additional security measures to be applied when handling unaccompanied baggage which should include 100 percent x-ray screening of all unaccompanied baggage at security level 2?
| 122 – 124
|
| 154.
| Should the port facility security organization have the capability to monitor the port facility and its nearby approaches, on land and water, at all times, including the night hours and periods of limited visibility, the restricted areas within the port facility, the ships at the port facility and areas surrounding ships?
| 121 – 123
|
| 155.
| Should the PFSP establish the procedures and equipment needed at each security level and the means of ensuring that monitoring equipment will be able to perform continually, including consideration of the possible effects of weather or of power disruptions?
| 124 – 126
|
| 156.
| Should the PFSP establish the security measures to be applied which may be a combination of lighting, security guards or use of security and surveillance equipment to allow port facility security personnel monitor the port facility at security level 1?
| 123 – 125
|
| 157.
| Which additional security measures to be applied to enhance the monitoring and surveillance capability should the PFSP establish at security level 2?
| 122 – 124
|
| 158.
| Should the PFSP establish details of the procedures and security measures the port facility could adopt if the port facility is at a lower security level than that applying to a ship?
| 125 – 127
|
| 159.
| When should the PFSP establish details of the procedures and security measures the port facility should apply if it activities not covered by the ISPS Code?
| 124 – 126
|
| 160.
| Should the PFSP establish how the PFSO intends to audit the continued effectiveness of the PFSP and the procedure to be followed to review, update or amend the PFSP?
| 124 – 126
|
| 161.
| When should the PFSP be reviewed?
| 126 – 128
|
| 162.
| Translation in which languages may the Statement of Compliance of aPort Facility include, should if the Contracting Government considers it appropriate, if the language used is not Spanish, French or English?
| 127 – 129
|
