Студопедия — Bibliography
Студопедия Главная Случайная страница Обратная связь

Разделы: Автомобили Астрономия Биология География Дом и сад Другие языки Другое Информатика История Культура Литература Логика Математика Медицина Металлургия Механика Образование Охрана труда Педагогика Политика Право Психология Религия Риторика Социология Спорт Строительство Технология Туризм Физика Философия Финансы Химия Черчение Экология Экономика Электроника

Bibliography






  • Altman, A., & Wellman, C.H. (2004), “A Defense of International Criminal Law”, 115 Ethics 35.
  • Ashworth, A. J. (2006), Principles of Criminal Law (5th ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ashworth, A. J., & Redmayne, M. (2005), The Criminal Process, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Becker, L. (1974), “Criminal Attempts and the Theory of the Law of Crimes,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 3: 262-94.
  • Besson, S., & Tasioulas, J. (eds.) (2008), Philosophy of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bianchi, H. (1994), Justice as Sanctuary: Toward a New System of Crime Control, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Blackstone, W. (1765-9), Commentaries on the Laws of England (4 vols), Oxford: Clarendon Press; available at www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/blackstone/blacksto.htm.
  • Boston University Law Review (1996), “Symposium: The Intersection of Tort and Criminal Law,” 76: 1-373.
  • Braithwaite, J. & Pettit, P. (1990), Not Just Deserts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Burns, R. P. (1999), A Theory of the Trial, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Cassese, A (2003), International Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Christie, N. (1977), “Conflicts as Property,” British Journal of Criminology 17: 1-15.
  • Cotterrell, R. (1995), Law's Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dagger, R. (1993), “Playing Fair with Punishment,” Ethics 103: 473.
  • Dagger, R. (2008), “Republican Punishment, Consequentialist or Retributive?,” in C. Laborde & J. Maynor (eds.), Republicanism and Political Theory, Indianapolis: Wiley.
  • Dan-Cohen, M. (1984), “Decision Rules and Conduct Rules: On Acoustic Separation in Criminal Law,” Harvard Law Review 97: 625-77.
  • –––. (2002), “ Defending Dignity”,in M. Dan-Cohen, Harmful Thoughts: Essays on Law, Self and Morality, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 150.
  • Dempsey, M. M. (2007), “Toward a Feminist State: What Does‘Effective’ Prosecution of Domestic Violence Mean?” Modern Law Review 70: 908-35.
  • Devlin, P. (1965), The Enforcement of Morals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dimock, S. (1997), “Retributivism and Trust,” Law and Philosophy 16: 37-62.
  • Dolinko, D. (1991), “Some Thoughts about Retributivism,” Ethics 101: 537-59.
  • Dressler, J. (2006), Understanding Criminal Law (4th ed.), New York: Lexis
  • Dubber, M. D. (2001), “Policing Possession: The War on Crime and the End of Criminal Law”, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 91: 829.
  • –––. (2005), The Police Power: Patriarchy and the Foundations of American Government, New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Duff, R. A. (1986), Trials and Punishments, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • –––. (2001), Punishment, Communication, and Community, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • –––. (2007), Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Duff, R. A., Farmer, L., Marshall, S. E., and Tadros, V. (2007), The Trial on Trial (3): Towards a Normative Theory of the Criminal Trial, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Dworkin, G. (ed.) (1994), Morality, Harm and the Law, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • Feinberg, J. (1984), Harm to Others, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • –––. (1985), Offense to Others, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • –––. (1986), Harm to Self, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • –––. (1988), Harmless Wrongdoing, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Fletcher, G. (1978), Rethinking Criminal Law, Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Gardner, J. (1998), “Crime: In Proportion and in Perspective,” in A. J. Ashworth & M. Wasik (eds.), Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 31-52.
  • –––. (2007), Offences and Defences, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Glazebrook, P. R. (1978), “Situational Liability,” in Glazebrook (ed.), Reshaping the Criminal Law, London: Stevens, 108-19.
  • Green, S. P. (1997), “Why it's a Crime to Tear the Tag off a Mattress: Over-Criminalization and the Moral Content of Regulatory Offenses,” Emory Law Journal 46: 1533-1615.
  • –––. (2005), Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White-Collar Crime, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Harcourt, B.E. (1999), “The Collapse of the Harm Principle”, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 90: 109.
  • Hart, H. L. A. (1968), Punishment and Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • –––. (1994), The Concept of Law (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hirst, M. (2003), Jurisdiction and the Ambit of the Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Holtug, N. (2002), “The Harm Principle”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5: 357.
  • Hughes, G. (1958), “Criminal Omissions,” Yale Law Journal 67: 590-637.
  • Hulsman, L. (1986), “Critical Criminology and the Concept of Crime,” Contemporary Crises 10: 63-80.
  • Husak, D. (1987), Philosophy of Criminal Law, Totowa, N. J.: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • –––. (1995), “The Nature and Justifiability of Nonconsummate Offenses,” Arizona Law Review 37: 151-83.
  • –––. 1998, “Does Criminal Liability Require an Act?” in R. A. Duff (ed.), Philosophy and the Criminal Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 60-100.
  • –––. (2004), “The Criminal Law as a Last Resort”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 24: 207.
  • –––. (2005), “Malum Prohibitum and Retributivism”, in R. A. Duff and S. P. Green (eds.) Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 65.
  • –––. (2007), Overcriminalization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jareborg, N. (2005), “Criminalization as Last Resort (Ultima Ratio)”, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 2: 521.
  • Kelman, M. (1981), “Interpretive Construction in the Substantive Criminal Law,” 33 Stanford Law Review: 591-673.
  • Kleinig, J. (1978), “Crime and the Concept of Harm,” American Philosophical Quarterly 27: 32-42.
  • Lacey, N., Wells, C., & Quick. O. (2003) Reconstructing Criminal Law (3rd ed.). London: LexisNexis.
  • Lamond, G. (2007), “What is a Crime?”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27: 609.
  • Luban, D (2004), “A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity”, 29 Yale Journal of International Law 124.
  • Marshall, S. E., & Duff, R. A. (1998), “Criminalization and Sharing Wrongs,” Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 11: 7-22.
  • May, L. (2005), Crimes Against Humanity, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mill, J. S. (1859), On Liberty, London: Parker.
  • Moore, M. S. (1993), Act and Crime, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • –––. (1997), Placing Blame: A Theory of Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Murphy, J. G., & Coleman, J. (1990), The Philosophy of Law (2nd ed.), Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
  • Norrie, A. W. (2001), Crime, Reason and History (2nd ed.), London: Butterworths.
  • Pettit, P. (1997), “Republican Theory and Criminal Punishment”, Utilitas 9: 59-79.
  • –––. (2002), “Is Criminal Justice Politically Feasible?”, Buffalo Criminal Law Review 5: 427.
  • Posner, R. A. (1985), “An Economic Theory of the Criminal Law,” 85 Columbia Law Review: 1193-1231.
  • Raz, J. (1986), The Morality of Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • –––. (1987), “Autonomy, Toleration, and the Harm Principle”, in R. Gavison (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 313.
  • Rescher, N. (1972), Welfare: The Social Issue in Philosophical Perspective, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Ripstein, A. (1999), Equality, Responsibility and the Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • –––. (2006), “Beyond the Harm Principle”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 34: 215.
  • Robinson, P. H. (1997), Structure and Function in Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Roxin, C. (2006), Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil (4th ed.), vol. 1, Munich: CH Beck.
  • Schonsheck, J. (1994), On Criminalization: An Essay in the Philosophy of the Criminal Law, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Simester, A. P., & Sullivan, G. R. (2007), Criminal Law: Theory and Doctrine (3rd ed.), Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Simester, A. P., & von Hirsch, A. (2006), Incivilities: Regulating Offensive Behaviour, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Steiker, C. (1997), “Punishment and Procedure: Punishment Theory and the Criminal-Civil Procedural Divide”, Georgetown Law Journal 85: 775.
  • Stephen, J. F. (1873/1967), Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (ed. J. White), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tadros, V. (2005), Criminal Responsibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • von Hirsch, A. (1996), “Extending the Harm Principle:‘Remote’ Harms and Fair Imputation,” in A. P. Simester & A. T. H. Smith (eds.), Harm and Culpability, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 259-76.
  • von Hirsch, A., Garland, D., & Wakefield, A. (eds.) (2000), Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  • Walker, N. (1980), Punishment, Danger and Stigma, Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Weigend, T (1988), “The Legal and Practical Problems Posed by the Difference between Criminal Law and Administrative Penal Law”, Revue Internationale de Droit Pénal 59: 67.
  • Williams, B. (1976), Morality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wohlers, W., von Hirsch, A., and Hefendehl, R. (eds.) (2003), Die Rechtsgutstheorie, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
  • Wolfenden, J. (1957), Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution (The Wolfenden Report) (Cmnd 247), London: HMSO.

 







Дата добавления: 2015-09-04; просмотров: 409. Нарушение авторских прав; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!



Вычисление основной дактилоскопической формулы Вычислением основной дактоформулы обычно занимается следователь. Для этого все десять пальцев разбиваются на пять пар...

Расчетные и графические задания Равновесный объем - это объем, определяемый равенством спроса и предложения...

Кардиналистский и ординалистский подходы Кардиналистский (количественный подход) к анализу полезности основан на представлении о возможности измерения различных благ в условных единицах полезности...

Обзор компонентов Multisim Компоненты – это основа любой схемы, это все элементы, из которых она состоит. Multisim оперирует с двумя категориями...

Значення творчості Г.Сковороди для розвитку української культури Важливий внесок в історію всієї духовної культури українського народу та її барокової літературно-філософської традиції зробив, зокрема, Григорій Савич Сковорода (1722—1794 pp...

Постинъекционные осложнения, оказать необходимую помощь пациенту I.ОСЛОЖНЕНИЕ: Инфильтрат (уплотнение). II.ПРИЗНАКИ ОСЛОЖНЕНИЯ: Уплотнение...

Приготовление дезинфицирующего рабочего раствора хлорамина Задача: рассчитать необходимое количество порошка хлорамина для приготовления 5-ти литров 3% раствора...

Гносеологический оптимизм, скептицизм, агностицизм.разновидности агностицизма Позицию Агностицизм защищает и критический реализм. Один из главных представителей этого направления...

Функциональные обязанности медсестры отделения реанимации · Медсестра отделения реанимации обязана осуществлять лечебно-профилактический и гигиенический уход за пациентами...

Определение трудоемкости работ и затрат машинного времени На основании ведомости объемов работ по объекту и норм времени ГЭСН составляется ведомость подсчёта трудоёмкости, затрат машинного времени, потребности в конструкциях, изделиях и материалах (табл...

Studopedia.info - Студопедия - 2014-2024 год . (0.011 сек.) русская версия | украинская версия