Студопедия — Definition
Студопедия Главная Случайная страница Обратная связь

Разделы: Автомобили Астрономия Биология География Дом и сад Другие языки Другое Информатика История Культура Литература Логика Математика Медицина Металлургия Механика Образование Охрана труда Педагогика Политика Право Психология Религия Риторика Социология Спорт Строительство Технология Туризм Физика Философия Финансы Химия Черчение Экология Экономика Электроника

Definition






Main Entry: 1slang

Pronunciation: 'sla[ng]

Function: noun

Etymology: origin unknown

Date: 1756

1: language peculiar to a particular group: as a: ARGOT b: JARGON 2

2: an informal nonstandard vocabulary composed typically of coinages,

arbitrarily changed words, and extravagant, forced, or facetious figures of

speech

- slang adjective

- slang•i•ly /'sla[ng]-&-lE/ adverb

- slang•i•ness /'sla[ng]-E-n&s/ noun

- slangy /'sla[ng]-E/ adjective

Main Entry: 2slang

Date: 1828

intransitive senses: to use slang or vulgar abuse

transitive senses: to abuse with harsh or coarse language

Main Entry: rhyming slang

Function: noun

Date: 1859

: slang in which the word intended is replaced by a word or phrase that rhymes with it (as loaf of bread for head) or the first part of the phrase (as loaf for head)

Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary

Slang nonstandard vocabulary composed of words or senses characterized primarily by connotations of extreme informality and usually by a currency not limited to a particular region. It is composed typically of coinages or arbitrarily changed words, clipped or shortened forms, extravagant, forced, or facetious figures of speech, or verbal novelties.

Slang consists of the words and expressions that have escaped from the cant, jargon and argot (and to a lesser extent from dialectal, nonstandard, and taboo speech) of specific subgroups of society so that they are known and used by an appreciable percentage of the general population, even though the words and expressions often retain some associations with the subgroups that originally used and popularized them. Thus, slang is a middle ground for words and expressions that have become too popular to be any longer considered as part of the more restricted categories, but that are not yet (and may never become) acceptable or popular enough to be considered informal or standard. (Compare the slang "hooker" and the standard "prostitute.")

Under the terms of such a definition, "cant" comprises the restricted, non-technical words and expressions of any particular group, as an occupational, age, ethnic, hobby, or special-interest group. (Cool, uptight, do your thing were youth cant of the late 1960s before they became slang.)

"Jargon" is defined as the restricted, technical, or shoptalk words and expressions of any particular group, as an occupational, trade, scientific, artistic, criminal, or other group. (Finals used by printers and by students, Fannie May by money men, preemie by obstetricians were jargon before they became slang.) "Argot" is merely the combined cant and jargon of thieves, criminals, or any other underworld group. (Hit used by armed robbers; scam by corporate confidence men.)

Slang fills a necessary niche in all languages, occupying a middle ground between the standard and informal words accepted by the general public and the special words and expressions known only to comparatively small social subgroups. It can serve as a bridge or a barrier, either helping both old and new words that have been used as "insiders' " terms by a specific group of people to enter the language of the general public or, on the other hand, preventing them from doing so. Thus, for many words, slang is a testing ground that finally proves them to be generally useful, appealing, and acceptable enough to become standard or informal. For many other words, slang is a testing ground that shows them to be too restricted in use, not as appealing as standard synonyms, or unnecessary, frivolous, faddish, or unacceptable for standard or informal speech. For still a third group of words and expressions, slang becomes not a final testing ground that either accepts or rejects them for general use but becomes a vast limbo, a permanent holding ground, an area of speech that a word never leaves. Thus, during various times in history,

American slang has provided cowboy, blizzard, okay, racketeer, phone, gas, and movie for standard or informal speech. It has tried and finally rejected conbobberation (disturbance), krib (room or apartment), lucifer (match), tomato (girl), and fab (fabulous) from standard or informal speech. It has held other words such as bones (dice), used since the 14th century, and beat it (go away), used since the 16th century, in a permanent grasp, neither passing them on to standard or informal speech nor rejecting them from popular, long-term use. Slang words cannot be distinguished from other words by sound or meaning. Indeed, all slang words were once cant, jargon, argot, dialect, nonstandard, or taboo. For example, the American slang to neck (to kiss and caress) was originally student cant; flattop (an aircraft carrier) was originally navy jargon; and pineapple (a bomb or hand grenade) was originally criminal argot. Such words did not, of course, change their sound or meaning when they became slang. Many slang words, such as blizzard, mob, movie, phone, gas, and others, have become informal or standard and, of course, did not change in sound or meaning when they did so. In fact, most slang words are homonyms of standard words, spelled and pronounced just like their standard counterparts, as for example (American slang), cabbage (money),

cool (relaxed), and pot (marijuana). Of course, the words cabbage, cool, and pot sound alike in their ordinary standard use and in their slang use. Each word sounds just as appealing or unappealing, dull or colourful in its standard as in its slang use. Also, the meanings of cabbage and money, cool and relaxed, pot and marijuana are the same, so it cannot be said that the connotations of slang words are any more colourful or racy than the meanings of standard words. All languages, countries, and periods of history have slang. This is true because they all have had words with varying degrees of social acceptance and popularity.

All segments of society use some slang, including the most educated, cultivated speakers and writers. In fact, this is part of the definition of slang. For example, George Washington used redcoat (British soldier); Winston Churchill used booze (liquor); and Lyndon B. Johnson used cool it (calm down, shut up).

The same linguistic processes are used to create and popularize slang as are used to create and popularize all other words. That is, all words are created and popularized in the same general ways; they are labeled slang only according to their current social acceptance, long after creation and popularization.

Slang is not the language of the underworld, nor does most of it necessarily come from the underworld. The main sources of slang change from period to period. Thus, in one period of American slang, frontiersmen, cowboys, hunters, and trappers may have been the main source; during some parts of the 1920s and '30s the speech of baseball players and criminals may have been the main source; at other times, the vocabulary of jazz musicians, soldiers, or college students may have been the main source.

To fully understand slang, one must remember that a word's use, popularity, and acceptability can change. Words can change in social level, moving in any direction. Thus, some standard words of William Shakespeare's day are found only in certain modern-day British dialects or in the dialect of the southern United States. Words that are taboo in one era (e.g., stomach, thigh) can become accepted, standard words in a later era. Language is dynamic, and at any given time hundreds, and perhaps thousands, of words and expressions are in the process of changing from one level to another, of becoming more acceptable or less acceptable, of becoming more popular or less popular.

Most linguists and lexicographers admit that the origin of the word slang is “uncertain” or “unknown”. One notable exception is Skeat, a lexicographer, who claims that slang (“vulgar language”) is of Scandinavian origin and a derivation of Icelandic slyngva (“to sling”), which can be compared with the Norwegian verb slengja (“to sling the jaw”) and the Norwegian noun slengjeord (“slang word”), used for insulting words. In a similar vein, Partridge referred by Eble in her book “Slang and Sociability; in-group language among college students” says that certain resemblances between English word slang and the Scandinavian sling suggest that the words have developed from a common Germanic root. In contrast, one of the Swedish researchers on slang Anna-Brita Stenstrom, in her article “From slang to slanguage: a description based on teenage talk” shows that one of the Swedish dictionaries consulted “Bonniers Stora Lexicon” maintains that the Swedish word slang comes from English slang, and that the origin is unknown. Also she provides an identical opinion of Swedish encyclopedia “Nationalencyclopedin”, which states that the word slang was not introduced in the Nordic countries until the middle of the 19th century. The first occurrence of the word slang is dated 1756 in the OED, according to which ultimate source is “not apparent”. Consequently, word “slang” appeared in English language earlier than in the languages of Scandinavian countries. Another view on the appearance of the word slang suggests that it is not an English word; it is the Gipsy term for their secret language. Some other philologists consider it derived from French. The phenomenon of slang appeared before it got the name “slang”. According to Swift slang is as old as speech, and traces of this may be found as far as we can refer back. Old English Slang was coarser, and depended more upon downright vulgarity than our modern slang. Slang of those days was generally termed “flash” language which represented both cant and slang. It is important to underline that the term “slang” was firstly recognized by Grose in 1785. He defined it as “cant or vulgar language”. Italian researcher Winona Bullard writes that different dialects and pronunciations in the Middle Ages represented the first meaning of the term “slang”. It was represented by certain writers such as Chauser, William Caxton and William of Malmesbury. The present-day meaning for slang began to form only in 16th or 17th century. English Criminal Cant is considered to be the starting point of slang. It was a new kind of speech used by criminals in saloons and gambling houses. It was at first believed that English criminal cant originated in Romania or had occurred in France. She also argues that some popular plays of Richard Brome (1635), poems and songs by Copland (1925) already contained some slang words. By the 1700’s the cultural differences in America had begun to influence the English-speaking population, and slang started to expand. During the 18th century slang was thought as incorrect usage of English and was considered forbidden. Eric Partridge in “Slang Today and Yesterday” notes that from about 1850’s, slang has been the accepted term for “illegitimate” colloquial speech. John Ayto in the Introduction to the “Oxford Dictionary of Modern Slang” writes that the first to which the term “slang” was applied, in the mid-eighteen century, was the special vocabulary used by any set of persons of a low and disreputable character. In the earlier centuries it was referred to as thieves’ cant or patter of earlier centuries. Nowadays slang is not associated with criminals. It acquires its form and is influenced by different cultures and the innovations of technology, which has left the society a variety of slang extremes from Street slang to Afro-American slang. Moreover, slang tends to originate in subcultures within a society. Slang expressions often embody attitudes and values of group members. They thus contribute to a sense of group identity and may convey information to the listener concerning the speaker’s background. Before an apt expression becomes a slang, it must be widely adopted by the members of the group. The vocabulary of slang changes rapidly: what is new and exciting for one generation is old-fashioned for the next. Old slang often either drifts to obsolescence or becomes accepted into the standard language, losing its eccentric colour. Flapper, for instance, started life in the late 19th century as a slang term for a young or lively woman, but subsequently moved into general language as a specific term for such a young woman of the 1920s. Similarly, the use of gay in the sense “homosexual” has its roots firmly in slang, but is now widely accepted as standard terminology. Slang has always been difficult to locate, to explain and to grasp as a unitary phenomenon. This has discouraged overall formal accounts. Therefore, the concept of slang has been inaccurately defined by many lexicographers who tend to restrict it to colloquial or bad language, and the term has been imprecisely used by many sociolinguists who conflate it with such language varieties as cant, jargon, dialect, vernacular, or accent. Galperin in “Stylistics” stresses that “no other European language has singled out a special layer of vocabulary and named it slang, though all of them distinguish such groups of words as jargon, cant, and the like”. Many attempts have been made to define slang, but many have been unable to come up with a distinct meaning. In addition to the complexity involved in finding a more accurate definition to the term, is the attitude that the public and scholars alike have about slang. The word “slang” evokes different reactions among the general public, scholars and linguists in particular. These reactions are often antagonistic and discordant, ranging from a perception of slang as simply “bad” English to slang as creative language variety worthy of academic investigation. Some linguists and lexicographers give a rather sweeping definition of the term “slang”. Quirk et all. mentions slang as a variation from casual to vulgar, but the distinction cannot be specified, since it is all the matter of attitude. Others, such as Dumas and Lighter (1978) avoid definitions altogether by instead providing identifying criteria, for instance, “its presence will markedly lower, at least for one moment, the dignity of formal or serious speech or writing” and “it is used in place of the well known conventional synonym”. Other researchers define slang in direct opposition to the conventional and standard language, and view it in terms of deviant and rebellious nature. They argue that slang is improper, unsystematic, unacceptable language usage, and unconventional vocabulary that diverges from that of standard lexicon (Munro, 1997; Burke, 1939; Lighter, 1994). Elisa Mattiello (2008) investigating the definitions provided by different scholars concludes that there are different approaches in composing a definition of slang. Most definitions of the term show tendency towards a sociological view of the phenomenon. The followers of this approach define slang as a social means of identification and cohesiveness of a group. According to Mattiello (2008) “within the sociological approach, slang is ascribed the two opposite purposes of keeping insiders together and outsiders out”. For instance Eble (1996) stresses the social and interpersonal aspects of slang and its function “to establish and reinforce social identity or cohesiveness within a group or with a trend or fashion in society at large”. Obviously, use of the same slang vocabulary helps to gain the acceptance in a group and to preserve group solidarity. Slang in sociological approach serves such social purposes as being on the same speech level with one’s audience, facilitating social intercourse, and inducing friendliness or intimacy. Another approach to define slang is the stylistic approach. Within this approach it is defined as a level of usage. Partridge (1947) neutrally and rather vaguely defines slang as “the quintessence of colloquial speech”, or as in Flexner (1960) that it is “not accepted as good, formal usage by majority.” In brief, slang is put into opposition to formal language: namely, it is below standard discourse and the neutral stylistic level, and typical of informal relaxed speech. Furthermore, slang is also juxtaposed to other non-standard varieties: it is neither dialect nor register, nor can it be assigned to the concepts of cant, argot, or jargon. Slang is changing rapidly; therefore it can be regarded as a short-lived ephemeral vocabulary that is expecting either to pass into obsolescence or becomes accepted in standard language. According to linguistic approach slang is regarded as the use of ordinary words in extraordinary senses or of extraordinary words in ordinary senses. This approach emphasizes the aspects of novelty and freshness of slang. Jespersen (1922) states that slang “finds amusement in the creation and propagation of new words and in attaching new meanings to old words”. Sornig (1981) defines slang as “an experimental language”. Mattiello (2008) highlights that slang distinguished from standard language in its morphology and its semantics. In morphology, “it is characterized by clear insubordination as regards the standard word-formation rules”, and in semantics, “it only renames everyday objects, but also enriches, qualifies and complexifies them”. If on the one hand, it is agreed that slang is a certain lexical layer, then giving to it the rank of language leads to miscomprehension and ambiguity. But, if slang is a language or a dialect, then it should be characterized not only by its peculiar use of words but also by phonetic, morphological and syntactical peculiarities. Nowadays slang covers both the specific and general sense. Usually it consists of new words and novel or extended meanings, and develops from the attempt to find fresh, vigorous, colourful, pungent or humorous expressions. To conclude, the theme should be investigated more carefully, because slang is changing rapidly. It is obvious that even existing researches are not enough in the sphere of slang investigation. Therefore, additional researches should be carried out.

 







Дата добавления: 2015-09-04; просмотров: 2040. Нарушение авторских прав; Мы поможем в написании вашей работы!



Картограммы и картодиаграммы Картограммы и картодиаграммы применяются для изображения географической характеристики изучаемых явлений...

Практические расчеты на срез и смятие При изучении темы обратите внимание на основные расчетные предпосылки и условности расчета...

Функция спроса населения на данный товар Функция спроса населения на данный товар: Qd=7-Р. Функция предложения: Qs= -5+2Р,где...

Аальтернативная стоимость. Кривая производственных возможностей В экономике Буридании есть 100 ед. труда с производительностью 4 м ткани или 2 кг мяса...

Ученые, внесшие большой вклад в развитие науки биологии Краткая история развития биологии. Чарльз Дарвин (1809 -1882)- основной труд « О происхождении видов путем естественного отбора или Сохранение благоприятствующих пород в борьбе за жизнь»...

Этапы трансляции и их характеристика Трансляция (от лат. translatio — перевод) — процесс синтеза белка из аминокислот на матрице информационной (матричной) РНК (иРНК...

Условия, необходимые для появления жизни История жизни и история Земли неотделимы друг от друга, так как именно в процессах развития нашей планеты как космического тела закладывались определенные физические и химические условия, необходимые для появления и развития жизни...

Задержки и неисправности пистолета Макарова 1.Что может произойти при стрельбе из пистолета, если загрязнятся пазы на рамке...

Вопрос. Отличие деятельности человека от поведения животных главные отличия деятельности человека от активности животных сводятся к следующему: 1...

Расчет концентрации титрованных растворов с помощью поправочного коэффициента При выполнении серийных анализов ГОСТ или ведомственная инструкция обычно предусматривают применение раствора заданной концентрации или заданного титра...

Studopedia.info - Студопедия - 2014-2024 год . (0.013 сек.) русская версия | украинская версия