Evaluation criteria portfolio

Criteria	The Perfect Score
Given all the structural parts
Self-introduction of additional parts
The use of research methods in the preparation of portfolio
Independence and originality in the preparation of portfolio
Making portfolio
Reflection on the benefits of a portfolio (summarizing)
The opinions expressed are his comrades
The quality of materials based on reflection
Bringing their own achievements
Presentation of the portfolio (protection)
Total:

 

For courses with a duration of more than one academic period (semester) hold rating calculation tolerance by the following formula:

R_д=

• where R₁ - the first intermediate rating,

• the number of intermediate ratings

• R₂ – second intermediate rating,

• R_n- subsequent interim ratings,

• n- the number of intermediate ratings

The intermediate rating are calculated as the arithmetic mean estimates the level of formation of competencies (t) and boundary (r) control

Рейтинг экзамена: E= Е₁ × 0,2 +Е₂ 0,2

Where Е_{1 -} scores for Stage I exam,

Е_{2 –} scores for Phase II exam.

The final grade consists of the rating and evaluation of the final admission control:

I = R × 0,6 + Е1 × 0,2 +Е2 × 0,2

where

I – the final assessment

R – admission score rankings

E – evaluation of the final control (examination of the discipline))

The final rating is 60% of the rating of admission and 40% of the final assessment of control.

 

The letter grade system of evaluation of the learning achievements of students corresponding to the digital equivalent on a four-on exams:

Score letter system	Digital equivalent points	% -percentage content	Score from the traditional system
А	10-9.5	95-100	Excellent
А-	9-9.4	90-94
В+	8.5-8.9	85-89	Good
В	8.0-8.4	80-84
В-	7.5-7.9	75-79
С+	7.0-7.4	70-74	Satisfactory
С	6.5-6.9	65-69
С-	6.0-6.4	60-64
D+	5.5-5.9	55-59
D	5.0-5.4	50-54
F	0-4.9	0-49	Unsatisfactory

3.11. Estimator of knowledge and skills of students:

Purpose: To systematically test the assimilation of the theoretical material, the ability to use theoretical knowledge in practice, the ability to work independently and in a team, ability to prepare and present the accumulated material.

Monitoring: performed during the practice session and SRSP, undergoing tests, written and oral questioning, performing laboratory tests, the solution case studies, testing protocols, training, protection abstracts.

Boundary control:colloquium, tests, skills, defense portfolio.

Final inspection:

exam in 2 stages:

I - testing kognikativnaya and legal competence)

II - receiving skills and communication skills

The evaluation criteria of competence (Annex 1Chek lists)