Annotation. The guy had a bad luck at his age to get such a rare disease.
The guy had a bad luck at his age to get such a rare disease. Diagnosis – ANAPLASTIC ASTROCYTOMA with multiple blastoma in brain and spinal cord, which is progressing very fast. Medical treatment bill may exceed UAH 600 000. Please help! Please, see below banking details of Kirill’s father (ylazorenko@gmail.com) for money transfer in Ukrainian hryvna and US Dollars.
Valerii Kolpakov Doctor of Law, Professor, Zaporizhzhya National University, Department of Administrative and Economic Law UDS 342.9 DOMINANT ATTRIBUTES OF ADMINISTRATIVE DELICT Annotation Dominant attributes of administrative delict. This article discusses the dominant (main) characteristics of administrative violations of law (administrative tort). The author explores the concept, features, types, a set of basic elements (attributes) of which is an administrative offense. He classifies them: a) the degree of public danger; b) the nature of the harm caused; c) guilty subjects; g) the structure; e) the regulation of the law. Proves that the collection of basic elements (attributes) form a system of administrative offense. Keywords: administrative delict; administrative law; attribute administrative delict; system attributes of the administrative delict; administrative tort law. Основные признаки административного деликта. В данной статье рассматриваются основные (доминирующие) признаки административных правонарушений (административных деликтов). Автор исследует понятие, характеристики, типы, совокупности базовых элементов (атрибутов), по которым деяние определяется как административный проступок. Рассматриваются их классификации: а) по степени общественной опасности; б) характеру причиненного вреда; в) виновным субъектам; г) структурным особенностям; д) регламентации в законодательстве. Ключевые слова: административное правонарушение; административное право; признак административного правонарушения; система признаков административного деликта; административно-деликтное право. Основні ознаки адміністративного делікту. У даній статті розглядаються основні (домінуючі) ознаки адміністративних правопорушень (адміністративних деліктів). Автор досліджує поняття, характеристики, типи, сукупності базових елементів (атрибутів), за якими діяння визначається як адміністративний проступок. Розглядаються їх класифікації: а) за ступенем суспільної небезпеки; б) характером заподіяної шкоди; в) винним суб'єктам; г) структурним особливостям; д) регламентацією в законодавстві. Ключові слова: адміністративне правопорушення; адміністративне право; ознака адміністративного правопорушення; система ознак адміністративного делікту; адміністративно-деліктне право. Minor violations of public prohibitions in Ukrainian legal system form a special type of legal industry - administrative tort law. Responsibility for such acts is provided by the Constitution of Ukraine[[1]].Therefore, the investigation of administrative delicts is important. In these studies, the central place occupies the doctrine of the attributes of an administrative delict. The doctrine of the attributes of an administrative tort has important theoretical and practical significance. Firstly, it facilitates identification and classification of the most significant features of antisocial acts, helps in establishment of fair sanctions; secondly, it assists law enforcement authorities to properly qualify offenses, thus setting adequate influence measures; thirdly, makes possible to understand the law, support training of lawyers, and promotes legal erudition of citizens[[2]]. Generally, the combination of elements is the description of act in the law. Description of an action not yet committed, but only possible or supposed. In practice, only legally significant features characterizing act as an offense, goes down for such a description. They have been named the structural features. The main source of this description is the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offences (hereinafter the CAO)[[3]]. Elements features may be permanent and variable. Permanent features received general recognition in legislation, legal theory, and social practice. For example, "age of administrative responsibility", "witness", "vehicle", "pedestrian", "firearm", "afforestation", "intellectual property", "building", "official" and so on. Variable features can change their meaning quite often. By rule, these features are contained in regulations. For example, the law established the responsibility for violation of infringement of sanitary rules (Art. 42)[[4]] Infringement of rules of trade by alcoholic drinks (Art. 156), public welfare (article. 152), holding dogs and cats (Art. 154), health facilities and lines of communication (Art. 147) and so on. These rules can be set, changed, canceled by the relevant authority, what results in changes of the respective compositions. Assessment features are widely used in description of essential elements. The content of such features in statute is not clearly defined, thus the question of their presence or absence is under law enforcement officials consideration. Therefore, theoretical studies play an important role in revealing of their content. Such features, as "gross violation" (Articles 85, 108), "Arbitrariness" (Article 186), "emergency situation" (Articles 127, 140), "provision of necessary conditions ащк living, training and education" (Article 184), "prodigal expenditure" (Articles 60, 98), "mismanagement maintenance" (Article 150), "mismanagement" (Art. 164-2), "devices similar to markings", "objects that contribute crowded birds hazardous to aircraft flight "(Art. 111),"insulting molestation to citizens", "similar actions" (Article 173) states that "offends human dignity and public morality "(Article 178), "persistent disobedience" (Article 185), "willful evasion" (Articles 185-3, 185-4), "reasonable excuses" (Article 210) and so on. Features could be distinguished by the degree of generalization[3]. In this case, it is referred to the following features: a) general; b) generic or specific; d) specific or individual. Common characteristics for all essential elements (illegality, sanity, fault etc.). Generic (specific) are typical for the group of elements. For example, essential elements, that describes violations in the field of standardization, product quality, metrology and certification. Social relationships that develop in this area are the specific object of encroachments in this case. Specific (individual) describes separate specific elements "expansion of inveracious hearings" (Art. 173), "stowaway travel" (Art. 135), "prostitution" (Art. 181-1), "silence in public places" (Art. 182), "narcotic substances in small sizes" (Art. 44)," organization of street procession "(Art. 185-1)," contempt of court" (Art. 185-3). The Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offences: Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukrainian SSR, 1984, annex to No. 51, Article 1122 (Brought into force by Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukrainian RSR, 1984, annex to No. 51, Article 1122. The source of these articles is the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offences, unless otherwise is noted. Essential elements of administrative offenses classifies depending on: 1) the degree of public danger - on basic and qualified; 2) the nature of damage - on material and formal; 3) the subject of an offense - on private and official (service); 4) the structure - on alternative and definite; 5) the design features - on descriptive and blanket (referential). Let’s examine characteristics of each type of essential elements of administrative offenses. 1. Basic and qualifying elements Recognizing this, or that act as an administrative offense and imposing sanctions for violation, the legislator considers that the degree of public danger of similar offences may be different. Thus, infringement by drivers of vehicles of railway crossings rules characterized by greater public danger while providing services for passengers or dangerous cargo transportation (Art. 123). Due to this fact in some cases legislator, considers several essential elements of administrative offenses, belong the same type of actions. These elements vary the degree of public danger. Any additional features called qualifying are indicating a higher degree of danger. Thus, features may be basic, such as occur in every case of commitment of offence and qualifying, such as supplements the basic features. Basic features in their turn form the so-called general essential element of an offence. If necessary, legislator complements essential elements with qualifying features, thus an act can be qualified under another article that imposes stricter punishment. Essential elements, with such features are named qualifying. In the Code it often appear such a qualifying feature as replication (Articles 44-2, 95, 104), an emergency situation (Articles 122, 127, 140), the presence or possibility of harmful material consequences (Articles 128-1, 140), state of drunkenness (Art. 127), leaving of a place of road traffic accident (Art. 122-4), a gross violation of rules (Art. 85), act committed by official (Articles 93, 95-1, 107-1). 2. Material and formal elements Material essential elements contain such features, as A) occurrence of harmful material consequences caused by committed act. For example, forest damage by sewage, caused its shrinkage (Art. 72), infringement of requirements of fire safety in woods (Art. 77), abduction of other's property (Art. 51); B) describes action that necessarily leads to harmful effects, despite they are not identified by the law: breach of law of a state ownership on bowels (Art. 47); excess of limits and specifications of use of natural resources (Art. 91-2); prodigal expenditure of fuel and energy resources (Art. 98); sale of products in violation of the requirements for health warnings on tobacco products (Article 168-2). To the formal (conditional term) belongs such elements that have no features of harmful material consequences. For example, residing without registration of location (Art. 197), infringement of a frontier regime (Art. 202), illegal withdrawal of passports in mortgage (Art. 201). Completing the description of material and formal essential elements of administrative offenses is important to note, that the criminal law concludes slightly different meaning in their concepts. Under the material elements herein understands those in which the end of crime is associated with the occurrence of socially dangerous consequences (a person can be attracted for murder only if in result of his actions someone’s death occurred); formal elements are those, where the occurrence of socially dangerous consequences is not a feature, i.e. recognition of crime with such essential elements requires only the establishment that the committed act is prohibited by the law. These crimes include, for example, illegal possession of firearms. 3. Service and private elements Essential elements of administrative offenses are divided into private and service (civil), depending on the subject of the offense, whether is he/she a civilian citizen or an official (Articles 93, 96, 99). The main characteristic of service offence is that the unlawful act should be committed through the service action[[5]]. According to the Article 14 of the CAO, officials are subject to administrative responsibility for noncompliance with established rules, resulting from the performance of his/her official duties. Thus, according to the Article 185-2 (Creation of conditions for the organization and conduct with infringement of the established order of assembly, meetings, street campaigns or demonstrations) establishes administrative liability for officials if they provide premises, transport, facilities for conduct with infringement of the established order of assembly, meetings, street campaigns or demonstrations. 4. Definite and alternative elements Division of essential elements on definite and alternative has a great practical value. Definite elements describe features of one act within the frameworks of one article of a regulation. For example, finishing of a minor to a state of intoxication (Art. 180), minor hooliganism (Art. 173), prostitution (Art. 181-1), and trade from hands in unstated places (Art.160). Alternative elements describe several actions within the frameworks of one Article of regulation. Herewith, an act considered as an offence if one, several (or even all) actions have been committed. For example, Art.189-1 of the CAO stipulates that a breach of earlier approved: - norms of extraction, - an established accounting procedure, as well as failure of proper storage conditions of extracted precious metals and precious stones, precious stones of organogenic origin and semi-precious stones, established account procedure as well as violation of all specified above by the extraction subject should be considered as an offence. As a separate offence it should be considered separately a breach of the established account procedure, violation of the established order of registration, failure to provide proper storage conditions for extracted precious metals, and violation of all the specified procedures together. Additionally, in this article we find an alternative offence items: it refers to rules concerning precious metals, precious stones, stones of organogenic origin, semi-precious stones. Alternative elements are contained in Articles 171 "Infringement of rules of manufacture, repair, sale and hire of means of technical equipment", 173-2 "violence over family default of the protective instruction" 177-2 "Manufacturing, purchase, storage or realization of the falsified alcoholic drinks or tobacco products", 186-3" Infringement of the order of representation or use of the given State statistical supervision" 189-2 "'Infringement of rules of manufacturing and the order of the account and storage of seals and stamps, and as manufacturing, import, realization and uses of self-type-setting press" and others. Thus, in such cases essential elements are the commitment of various actions, named in the law. At the same time, for performance of essential elements it doesn't matter if one, two, or all actions together have been committed. It is important to note, that a person is not committing a new offense if he/she consistently performs all actions named in the law, for example, initially illegal purchase, than storage and transfer of narcotic substances (Art. 44 of the CAO). If a citizen drinks alcohol beverages in public place and after appears in public place in a state of intoxication, that offends human dignity and public morality, in this case he/she commits one, but not two offenses (Art. 178 of the CAO). Separate actions of the same person, both manufacturing and selling of the forbidden instruments of getting objects of animal or flora, compose essential elements of one offence (Art. 85-1 of the CAO). Thus, if the definite essential elements name those common features they consist of, then instead the alternative elements have several features variants. Frequently this characteristic of features description is caused by the desire of legislator to avoid general formulation, as well as to reveal the content of these features and specify it. And in some cases, the design of the alternative features is linked to the desire of authorities to save normative material and, instead of several articles creation, to create a single, but broader in its scope. 5. Descriptive and blanket (referential) elements Descriptive essential elements that reveal the content and nature of an act in the full scope are recognized as an administrative offense. For example, minor hooliganism (Art. 173), drinking beer, alcohol, alcoholic beverages on manufacturing (Art. 179), an inveracious call of special services (Art. 183), intentional damage of passport (Art. 198). Article with the descriptive essential elements contains all of the three elements of legal norms (hypothesis, disposition and sanction). In this case, the logical structure of standards of law coincides with structure of an article of a legal act. The main purpose of such a development of normative materials is to promote individuals that apply for a provision with the possibility to find in appropriate article all necessary structural elements. Blanket (or referential) elements contain a reference to related regulatory act that is necessary for establishment, if there is a lack of corpus delicti in actions or not. There are three types of such references known. First, it refers to a specific article of the same regulation, containing missing data of legal norms. For example, considering nature of committed offense and offender’s personality to specified persons (except persons who committed an offense under Article 185 measures of influence defined by Article 13 of CAO can be applied; penalties for an offense covered by Article 164-14, could be imposed within three months, from the day it was first detected Art. 38; small-sized vessels in the first, third, fourth and fifth paragraphs of an Article 116, second paragraph of an Article 116-1, third paragraph of Article 116-2, first paragraph of an Article 117, third paragraph of Article 118, paragraph three of Article 129, paragraph five of Article 130 of this Code should be understood as a self-propelled vessels with the main engines power less than 75 hp (Art.116); Sate inspectors of Agriculture sphere have the right to constitute reports on administrative violations, within the jurisdiction of the authorities referred to in Articles 222 — 244-19 (Art. 255); things and documents which are tools or direct object of an offense and items that were found during detention, personal inspection or required inspection, subject to withdrawal by officials specified in articles 234-1, 234-2, 244-4, 262 and 264 (Art. 265); in the circumstances referred to in paragraphs 5, 6 і 9 Art. 247, agency (official) that ordered the imposition of administrative penalties, terminates its execution (Art. 302). Second, it refers to another regulation. For example, infringement of rules of protection of electric networks (Art. 99); excess by drivers of vehicles of speed of movement, default of signals of regulation of traffic, infringement of rules of transportation of people and other traffic rules (Art. 122); infringement of Rules of protection of the main pipelines (Art. 138); failure of chief and other officials of State authorities, institutions and organizations, including the branches of the National Bank of Ukraine, commercial banks and other financial and credit institutions, the legal requirements of officials of the income and charges referred to in sub-paragraphs 20.1.3, 20.1.24, 20.130, 1/20/31 of paragraph 20.1 of Art. 20 of the Tax Code of Ukraine (Art. 163-3); violation by individual of statutory restrictions on business or other paid activities (Art. 172-4); violation of the rules of administrative supervision (Art. 187). Third, it refers to several different regulations. For instance, infringement of conditions and rules of realization of the international automobile transportation of passengers and cargo (Art. 133-2); infringement of rules, norms and standards at the maintenance of highways and roads (Art. 140); infringement of rules of an accomplishment of territories of cities and other settlements (Art. 152); infringement of the legislation of budgetary system of Ukraine, purchase in advance of the goods, works and services for public funds (Art. 164-12); release and realization of production which does not meet the requirements of standards, non-standard production, certificates of compliance, regulations and samples (standards) for safety, quality, completeness and packaging (Art. 167). In such cases, essential elements are "collected" from several different independent offences. This is the violation of various acts, regulations and requirements. Using formal approach in this case it is not difficult to indicate several offenses. For example, the infringement of the established rules and mode of operation of installations and manufactures from processing and recycling of waste (Art. 82). Moreover, legislator considers all these acts, as one offense. The basis of this approach is the likeness of these acts, so they are identical and have one and the same legal features of an essential element. It should be also noted, that in one blanket construction of an essential element of an offence, a number of different references types could be combined. As an example Article 125 "Other infringements of traffic rules", establishes violations of traffic rules, except foreseen by Articles 121-128, part first and part second of Art. 129, Articles 139, 140 of the CAO. Article 212-10, establishes restrictions on campaigning: campaigning person, whose participation in the election campaign is prohibited by law, campaigning beyond the terms established by law, or in places prohibited by law, campaigning in ways and means that are contrary to the Constitution and Laws of Ukraine, or other breach of statutory restrictions on campaigning, except foreseen by Articles 212-9, 212-13 and 212-14 of the Code. In addition to these, the classification base of essential elements of administrative offences could be amended with other criteria. According to this feature of the subjective side, as a form of fault, offenses can be divided into intentional and reckless, and on the basis of motives into acquisitive and altruistic etc.
[1] Kolpakov V. Constitutionality of Administrative Responsibility / Valerii Kolpakov // Law of Ukraine, 2012, No 3–4, P. 195 – 208. [2] Kolpakov V. Subject matter of Ukrainian administrative law: the concept evolution / Valerii Kolpakov // Scientific Letters of Academic Society of Michal Baludansky. – Slovakia, Košice: Academic Society of Michal Baludansky, 2014. – No 2. – P. 66-68. [3] Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offences: Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukrainian RSR, 1984, annex to No. 51, Article 1122 (Brought into force by Resolution of Verkhovna Rada of Ukrainian RSR No. 8074-10 of 07.12.84, BVRU 1984, annex to No. 51, Article 1123). [4] Koval L. Administrative Law: Educational lectures for Law students / L. Koval – K.: Ventura., 1998 - 208 p. [5] O. Husar: Functions aviation personnel / Olga Husar // Scientific Letters of Academic Society of Michal Baludansky. – Slovakia, Košice: Academic Society of Michal Baludansky, 2014. – No 2. – P. 48-50.
|