Choose the best answer to the following questions.

1. What is the main idea of the article?

a. To give some information about depression.

b. To warn people that depression should be treated.

c. To make people realize that depression is a serious disease.

d. To make governments change their attitudes to depression.

2. Why do policy makers ignore the problem of depression?

a. Because few people suffer from depression.

b. Because depression cannot be clearly diagnosed.

c. Because depression is just a side-effect of drug abuse.

d. Because the given disease doesn’t produce any noticeable effect on society.

3. Why must the problem of depression be taken seriously?

a. Because it is incurable.

b. Because it leads to drug abuse.

c. Because it is a burden on the economy.

d. Because it seriously affects the health of people suffering from it.

4. What is the most common attitude to people suffering from depression?

a. People suffering from depression are considered drug addicts.

b. They aren’t really sick.

c. People suffering from depression are themselves to blame for it.

d. They only want to find a substantial pretext to abstain from work.

 

Vocabulary. Read the article again, find the following words and word combinations in the text and learn their meaning. Make it a particular point to use these words in the further discussion of the problem.

A policy maker, a malignant growth, to malfunction, subjective, to be sensitive to smth, to rely on smb, weight fluctuation, sleep disturbance, fatigue, poor concentration, (low) self-esteem, to contemplate smth, self-medication, in terms of smth, to prevail, a health-care budget, to bring smb relief, to keep smth/smb at bay.

Discussion

1. How can you comment on the following quotation: “As cancer is a malignant growth, so depression is a malignant sadness.”

2. Do you agree that an increase in the number of people suffering from depression can present a certain danger to society?

3. Do you think depression should be treated professionally or would you rather say a sick person can do with self-medication?

4. Do you think taking anti-depressants can lead to an addiction?

5. How can you tell whether a person is suffering from depression or whether he/she is just going through a spell of bad mood?

6. Do you think people’s attitude to depression will ever change?

Professional Reading

 

Read the following article very carefully. You must achieve complete understanding of the text, so use a dictionary by all means. While reading, find the following words and word combinations in the text, learn their meaning and use them in the further discussion of the problem.

 

A (high) suicide rate, to inject lethal drugs, to legalize euthanasia, mercy killing, to be reviewed by a lawyer, to be eligible, to be terminally ill, (in)humane, to exclude smb, (to cause) impaired judgment, to opt for smth, polls.

 

A License to Kill?

Critics say a Dutch euthanasia law goes too far.

French writer Emile Durkheim noticed a century ago that such intensely regulated environments like religious sects and military bases had higher suicide rates. Which makes you wonder what he would say about a society that decides to regulate suicide – that actually allows you to apply for it like a driver’s license. Would that society experience a spate of “contagious” suicides, as Durkheim might theorize today?

We will find out. It is already possible in the Netherlands for doctors to inject lethal drugs into chronically ill people who want to die. No other nation has formerly legalized euthanasia. And though mercy killings have not been criminally punished for years in the Netherlands and a few other places – Colombia and Switzerland among them – there’s something creepy about how far the Dutch have gone with the law. Now doctors will be able to euthanize sick children as young as 12, as long as the kids ask and Mom and Dad agree.

To be sure, the Netherlands hasn’t completely become Hemlock land. Two physicians must agree that a euthanasia applicant suffers an unbearable, hopeless condition. Subsequently, each case of mercy killing will be reviewed by a lawyer. Something like the Dutch law exists only in one US state, Oregon, but its Death with Dignity Act is less sweeping. Only those who are 18 are eligible and applicants must be terminally ill and have six months or less to live. Under its strict rules, doctors there signed only 96 prescriptions for lethal doses of medication from 1998 through 2000. By comparison, physicians euthanize roughly 4,000 Dutch each year.

Not surprisingly, the regulation of such decisions creates many grey areas. In the Netherlands, cancer patient Lenie Lemckert, 68, says the Dutch requirement that the patient experiences unbearable suffering is inhumane. “Is the fact that your situation is hopeless not enough?” asks Lemckert. In Oregon, because patients must be able to swallow pills in order to kill themselves, many worry about waiting past the point they can ingest substances. State officials wonder whether the law violates the Americans with Disabilities Act by excluding those who can’t swallow. “And can a family member lift a cup to their lips? I don’t know,” says Dr Karina Hedberg of the Oregon health division. “Those things have to play out in court.”

Mercy-killing foes feel emboldened by the legal uncertainties. A psychologist must agree that Oregon applicants don’t suffer “depression causing impaired judgment,” but critics say that standard is vague. Dutch opponents also focus on the emotionally impaired. “Vulnerable patients who consider themselves a burden might opt for euthanasia while in fact they would be happier with improved care,” says Henk Jochemsen of the Dutch Center for Medical Ethics.

Polls show that euthanasia law is popular in Europe, and other countries may follow. South Korean doctors asked for a similar law this year. But in the US, opponents hope Attorney General John Ashcroft will rescind his predecessor’s ruling that the federal Controlled Substances Act doesn’t bar Oregon’s use of drugs for mercy killing. If he does, the case will go to court.

Whatever the law, informal doctor-assisted suicides will occur, as they have for years. “Doctors give a bunch of drugs with a coded message: Go home and do what you want,” says Dr Lauren Shaiova, an end-of-life expert at Manhattan’s Beth Israel hospital. She says that is sometimes the only solution for dying people crashed by fatigue and darkness.

(From ‘Time’, abridged)