Monophthongs
OE a, o, ō, u, ū, e, ē, ı, ī remained more or less unchanged in ME, while OE ā, æ, ǣ, y, ӯ, å changed radically. OE long ā; developed into long open Ǭ everywhere but in the Northern dialect. This new [Ǭ] was of much more open nature than the OE [ (1) In ME manuscripts, the two types of ō were mostly represented by the same symbols: o – in open syllables, and oo – in closed ones. Later they were distinguished not only in sound but in spelling too: [ Note. ME [ā] from OE [o] in open syllables was also of an open nature and mostly coincided with [ǭ] from OE [ā]. Therefore, we find the same way of representation of ME [ǭ] in hope < OE hopa and stone < OE stān.
(2) OE short æ in most dialects developed into short a, e.g. OE ʒlæd > ME glad, OE æppel > ME appel, OE wæs > ME was. (3) OE long ǣ changed into long open OE sǣ > ME sea, OE mǣl > ME meal, OE fēlan > ME felen, OE fēt > ME feet. Note. The sound [
(4) OE å developed into ME o only in West Midland. In all other dialects OE åchanged into a: West Midland OE lånd > ME lond, OE mån > ME mon, OE lånʒ > ME long. Other dialects: land, man, lang. In most cases, the Modern English form is based on that of the Eastern dialects. Only before -ng forms with o predominate: long, strong, song. (5) The vowels y and ӯ; existed in OE dialects up to the the X c. Then they changed into i/ ī in the North-East (NrE): OE hyll > NrE hill (hill), OE fӯr > NrE > fir (fire). y, ӯ remained unchanged in the South-West (SW)(written u, ui): OE hyll > SW hull, OE fӯr > SW fuir y, ӯ were replaced by e, ē in the South East (SE) (Kent): OE hyll > SE hell, OE fӯr > SE fēr In most cases ME forms with i/ī predominate. Sometimes the influence of other dialects is evident. In the word busy the spelling reflects the influence of the Western dialects. The same is true about the verb to build. The pronunciation of the verb to bury is due to the South -Eastern dialects, while the spelling is of Western origin.
|