Development of architecture in Kyivan Rus
By the time of adopting Christianity, Rus was good at wooden sculpture, moulding and embossing. As for architecture, it surely existed, but it is difficult to say anything definite about it as not a single monument of that epoch has survived. According to archeological diggings there wasn’t any monumental stone architecture till the end of the 10th century. There were either wooden constructions or earth-houses for wood and clay were in abundance. Clay bricks became widespread from the middle of the 10th century. Wooden architecture became the basis of the peculiar style of Rus, which provided optimal combination of beauty and functionality.
In the 10-11th centuries there were mainly Byzantine builders engaged in stone architecture. There were many difficulties for them. Firstly, the building materials differed much from the Byzantine ones. Secondly, Russian people were accustomed to wooden architecture. In the years of feudal disunity there appeared various stone laying styles. They concerned mainly materials. Thus in Novgorod builders used limestone, while in Kyiv, Smolensk, Chernigov and Ryazan’ – plinth (broad and flat burnt stone) was used. The majority of churches were one-domed. Mosaic pictures started giving way to frescoes.
Answer the questions: 1. Why is it difficult to say anything definite about ancient Russian architecture? 2. What building material was popular with the Slavs? 3. Why did builders prefer an axe to a saw? 4. What size were common houses constructed? 5. Were there any signs if double belief in Russian houses? 6. What phenomenon affected the health of tenants? 7. What problems did foreign builders face in Rus? 8. What changes in the years of feudal disunity took place in architecture?
|