Scientific Prose StyleSCIENTIFIC WRITTEN LANGUAGE Galina Goumovskaya The purpose of science as a branch of human activity is to disclose by research the inner substance of things and phenomena of objective reality and find out the laws regulating them, thus enabling man to predict, control and direct their future development in order to improve the material and social life of mankind. The style of scientific prose is therefore mainly characterized by an arrangement of language means which will bring proofs to clinch a theory. The main function of scientific prose is proof. The selection of language means must therefore meet this principle requirement. The genre of scientific works is mostly characteristic of the written form of language (scientific articles, monographs or textbooks), but it may also be found in its oral form (in scientific reports, lectures, discussions at conferences, etc.); in the latter case this style has some features of colloquial speech. The first and most noticeable feature of this style is the logical sequence of utterances with clear indication of their interrelations and interdependence, that is why in no other functional style there is such a developed and varied system of connectives as in scientific prose. The most frequently words used in scientific prose are functional words and dash; conjunctions and prepositions. The first 100 most frequent words of this style comprises the following units: a) prepositions: of, to, in, for, with, on, at, by, from, out, about, down; b) prepositional phrases: in terms of; in view of, in spite of, in common with, on behalf of, as result of; by means of, on the ground of, in case of; c) conjunctional phrases: in order that, in case that, in spite of the fact that, on the ground that, for fear that; d) pronouns: one, it, we, they; e) notional words: people, time, two, like, man, made, years. As scientific prose is restricted to formal situations and, consequently, to formal style, it employs a special vocabulary which consists of two main groups: words associated with professional communication and a less exclusive group of so-called learned words which are mostly polysyllabic words drawn from the Romance languages and, though fully adapted to the English phonetic system, some of them continue to sound singularly foreign. Their very sound seems to create complex associations: deleterious, emollient, incommodious, meditation, illusionary. A particularly important aspect of scientific and technological language is the subject-neutral vocabulary which cuts across different specialized domains. In particular, a great deal of scientific work involves giving instructions to act in a certain way, or reporting on the consequences of having so acted. Several lexical categories can be identified within the language of scientific instruction and narrative: Verbs of exposition: ascertain, assume, compare, construct, describe, determine, estimate, examine, explain, label, plot, record, test, verify. Verbs of warning and advising: avoid, check, ensure, notice, prevent, remember, take care; also several negative items: not drop, not spill. Verbs of manipulation: adjust, align, assemble, begin, boil, clamp, connect, cover, decrease, dilute, extract, fill, immerse, mix, prepare, release, rotate, switch on, take, weigh. Adjectival modifiers and their related adverbs: careful(y), clockwise, continuous(ly), final(ly), gradual(ly), moderate(ly), periodic(ally), secure(ly), subsequent(ly), vertical(ly). The general vocabulary employed in scientific prose bears its direct referential meaning, that is, words used in scientific prose will always tend to be used in their primary logical meaning. Hardly a single word will be found here which is used in more than one meaning. Nor will there be any words with contextual meaning. Even the possibility of ambiguity is avoided. Likewise neutral and common literary words used in scientific prose will be explained, even if their meaning is slightly modified, either in the context or in a foot-note by a parenthesis, or an attributive phrase. A second and no less important feature and, probably, the most conspicuous, is the use of terms specific to each given branch of science. Due to the rapid dissemination of scientific and technical ideas, particularly in the exact sciences, some scientific and technical terms begin to circulate outside the narrow field they belong to and eventually begin to develop new meanings. But the overwhelming majority of terms do not undergo this process of de-terminization and remain the property of scientific prose. There they are born, develop new terminological meanings and there they die. No other field of human activity is so prolific in coining new words as science is. The necessity to penetrate deeper into the essence of things and phenomena gives rise to new concepts, which require new words to name them. A term will make more direct reference to something than a descriptive explanation, non-term. Furthermore, terms are coined so as to be self-explanatory to the greatest possible degree. But in spite of this, a new term in scientific prose is generally followed or preceded by an explanation. In modern scientific prose one can observe an exchange of terms between various branches of science. It is due to the interpenetration of scientific ideas. Self-sufficiency in any branch is now a thing of the past. Collaboration of specialists in related sciences has proved successful in many fields. The exchange of terminology may therefore be regarded as a natural outcome of this collaboration. Mathematics has priority in this respect. Mathematical terms have left their own domain and travel freely in other sciences, including linguistics. A third characteristic feature of scientific style is special sentence-patterns. They are of three types: postulatory, argumentative and formulative. A hypothesis, a scientific conjecture or a forecast must be based on facts already known, on facts systematized and defined. Therefore every piece of scientific prose will begin with postulatory statements which are taken as self-evident and needing no proof. Discourse Structure There is a balance between abstract and concrete points. General discussion alternates with accounts of experiments. The problems are explained as they arose over time. The reader is told how the thinking developed. A new element at the end of one sentence is often picked up as a given element at the beginning of the next. The relations between the sentences and clauses are often made explicit through the use of connectives. The sentences usually have a cross-reference back to a preceding sentence or clause. This makes it clear that a given topic is still being discussed, and reduces the scope for vagueness. Sentence Structure Sentences range from 7 to 52 words. This is typical of academic writing. Clauses have short subjects, with most of the information stated after the verb. Such sentences are much easier to understand than alternative. The passive constructions are a helpful way of ensuring a smooth flow of ideas, and are important in allowing objects to receive prominence within clause structure. The syntax of scientific speech is characterized by the use of complete (non-elliptical) sentences, the use of extended complex and compound sentences without omission of conjunctions, as they enable the author to express the relations between the parts more precisely (as different from the asyndetic connection typical of colloquial speech), the use of bookish syntactic constructions with non-finite forms of the verb, the use of extended attributive phrases, often with a number of nouns as attributes to the head-noun, e.g. the germ plasma theory; the time and space relativity theory; the World Peace Conference; a high level consensus; the greenhouse effect; carbon dioxide emission; fossil fuel burning; deforestation problems. A fourth observable feature of the style of modern scientific prose, and one that strikes the eye of the reader, is the use of quotations and references. These sometimes occupy as much as half a page. The references have a definite compositional pattern, namely, the name of the writer referred to, the title of the work quoted, the publishing house, the place and the year it was published, and the page of the excerpt quoted or referred to. One of the internationally recognized styles of bibliographic records is known as the Harvard System. It lists references in alphabetical order. Where there is more than one work by the same author, these are listed chronologically. If there is more than one work in the same year, a letter is added: 2004a, 2004b. The Harvard System has a number of different formats, depending on the type of references, for example, consider reference to a book, here the sequence is: name, initials; year of publication; title in italics; edition (if not the first); place of publication; publisher: Cruse A.(2000). A fifth feature of scientific style, which makes it distinguishable from other styles, is the frequent use of foot-notes, not of the reference kind, but digressive in character. This is in full accord with the main requirement of the style, which is logical coherence of ideas expressed. Anything that seems to violate this requirement or seems not to be immediately relevant to the matter in hand but at the same time serves indirectly to back up the idea will be placed in a foot-note. The impersonality of scientific writings can also be considered a typical feature of this style. The author of scientific works tends to sound impersonal. This quality is mainly revealed in the frequent use of passive constructions. Scientific experiments are generally described in the Passive voice. The characteristic feature of scientific prose style is the use of typically bookish syntactic structures for example, the compound type of predicate: These gases are easy to control but they are persistent once emitted (= It is easy to control these gases, but it is hard to stop them when they come out); Deforestation is probably even harder to change (= It is even harder to change the situation when forests begin to disappear). Another feature is the use of abstract nouns, gerundial, participial or infinitive constructions instead of the much simpler clauses with conjunctions: Apart from this, controlling emission of greenhouse gases would require huge increase in energy efficiency (= Besides, if we want to control the gases which come out when the air becomes warmer, we shall have to produce much more energy); Agreement to implement such huge projects would require overcoming differences between the countries (=If we want to agree to carry out such big projects, we shall have to change the situation when every country is different from another); The measures suggested are worth considering / require careful consideration (= It is necessary to think about what we have suggested). There is a noticeable difference in the syntactical design of utterances in the exact sciences (mathematics, chemistry, physics, etc.) and in the humanities. The passive constructions frequently used in the scientific prose of the exact sciences are not indispensable in the humanities. This perhaps is due to the fact that the data and methods of investigations applied in the humanities are less objective. The necessity to quote the passages under observations and to amplify arguments seriously affects syntactical patterns. In the humanities some seemingly well-known statement may be and often is subjected to revaluation, whereas in the exact sciences much can be accepted without question and therefore needs no comment. (from English 1 September: http://eng.1september.ru/2007/16/8.html) Starting and Finishing Master’s Thesis Galina Goumovskaya An Master’s thesis in any field of knowledge is usually written in accord with some universal scheme that is highly standardized. This applies both to the structure of the whole text, its design and to the arrangement of individual parts. Depending on the type of research, the composition and the content of its individual parts may slightly vary. An Master’s thesis usually consists of the following parts: 1. Introduction or Preamble where the researcher states his / her aims and introduces the main claim; 2. Theoretical part which provides a framework for research; 3. Analytical (experimental) part which displays the process of examining a particular subject, the methods and principles applied; 4. Conclusion which describes the results of the research done after considering all the information collected. In Linguistics Studies one is also to have a summary of Conclusion, either in English or in the native language;
|
