A. Is there any (science) evidence that the world will end? Some (religion) groups have made definite (predict) about the year in which the (destroy) of the Earth will take place. Scientists tend to be more (caution) and say that, apart from the possibility of a (catastrophe) accident, the earth’s (nature) life span will depend largely on the (behave) of the sun. Some claim that, in about 3,5 billion years, the increased (strong) of the sun’s rays will (avoidable) boil away the earth’s surface water. But such a (tragic) is still a long way off!
B. When we think of the future we think of a (digit) world opening out in front of us, where vast amounts of data are transmitted at the speed of light for the general good or bad of (human). We try to (image) a new type of existence, where limits are broken and things happen that we can’t even dream about. Not (need) so, cry many social (comment) who say that our society is in fact becoming more medieval.
Their argument goes like this: the greatest gulf between medieval and 21st century thought is the (assume) today that no matter what things may look like on the surface, the world is fundamentally (cohere) and there is no order. In the Middle Ages the exact opposite was the case – but there is now a hankering to return to this happier order. People nowadays think that progress only causes anxiety and (stable). They see it as creating divisions between its (benefit) and those who are left behind, remaining as confused (stand) living on the (skirt) of society.
